Enter Any URL
Type any public website domain. We fetch the page server-side and analyze the raw HTML for SEO signals.
- Works with any public website
- No login or verification needed
- Analyzes the actual page HTML
Analyze any website's on-page SEO in seconds. Check title tags, meta descriptions, headings, structured data, social tags, and more.
Checks your title tag length, meta description, and whether they follow SEO best practices.
Verifies H1 uniqueness and H2/H3 hierarchy for proper content organization.
Checks Open Graph tags, Twitter Cards, and social sharing readiness.
HTTPS, canonical URLs, robots directives, viewport, lang attribute, and structured data.
Our on-page SEO audit fetches your page and analyzes 15+ factors that affect search engine visibility.
Type any public website domain. We fetch the page server-side and analyze the raw HTML for SEO signals.
Each check is scored as pass, warning, or fail. Your overall score reflects the weighted average of all checks.
Each failed or warning check includes a specific recommendation. Focus on the highest-weight items first for maximum impact.
Understanding what your SEO checker is actually measuring — and what to do about it.
An SEO audit is a systematic examination of the factors that affect how well your website ranks in search engines. Unlike a one-off check, a proper audit covers three distinct layers: technical SEO (how well search engines can crawl and index your site), on-page SEO (how well individual pages are optimized for target keywords), and off-page SEO (the external signals — primarily backlinks — that indicate your site's authority). Most tools, including this checker, focus primarily on technical and on-page factors because these are directly measurable from the publicly visible HTML of any page.
Not all SEO signals carry equal weight. After auditing thousands of pages, these seven factors consistently have the greatest impact on rankings:
An SEO score of 85+ means your page has most fundamentals in place. Scores between 60–84 indicate several fixable issues. Below 60 suggests multiple critical problems holding rankings back.
Missing meta descriptions, incorrect title tag length, missing alt text on images, and absent viewport tags are all fixable in minutes with direct access to your CMS or codebase.
Core Web Vitals improvements, structured data implementation, and heading hierarchy restructuring often require developer involvement and content planning but deliver compounding returns over time.
The most common SEO problems we see in audits fall into predictable patterns. Missing meta descriptions leave Google to generate arbitrary snippets, often pulling irrelevant text that reduces click-through rates. Duplicate content — the same text appearing on multiple URLs — causes Google to choose which version to rank, often picking the wrong one. Thin pages with fewer than 300 words rarely rank for competitive terms because they lack the depth to demonstrate topical expertise.
Broken internal links waste crawl budget and create dead ends for users. Every 404 on an internal link is a lost opportunity to pass link equity to a relevant page. Missing canonical tags are especially problematic for e-commerce sites with faceted navigation, where filtering by color or size creates hundreds of near-duplicate URLs that confuse search engines about the authoritative version of a product page.
Audit frequency should scale with the pace of change on your site. Growing sites publishing multiple pieces of content per week should run automated checks monthly — new pages frequently introduce new issues. Established sites with stable content can audit quarterly, with spot-checks any time a major update is deployed. Any time you migrate platforms, change URL structures, or redesign your site, run a full audit immediately before and after the change. SEO issues introduced during migrations can take months to reverse if caught late.
Google's Core Web Vitals are the clearest example of technical SEO directly impacting rankings. LCP measures how long it takes for the largest visible element on the page to load — typically a hero image or above-the-fold heading. The target is under 2.5 seconds. CLS measures visual stability: how much page elements shift around as the page loads. A CLS score above 0.1 is visually jarring and penalized. INP measures responsiveness to user interactions — clicking buttons, filling forms. Each of these metrics is measurable by our speed checker and directly correlated with both rankings and conversion rates. A 1-second improvement in LCP has been shown to increase conversions by 7% in e-commerce contexts.